What should a two-day OpenAI Codex curriculum for senior engineers cover?
A two-day OpenAI Codex curriculum for senior engineers covers Delegate, Review, Own, repo context, large or legacy codebases, debug and verification, AI-assisted review, and org standards across Day 1 and Day 2. The default shape is two days, onsite or offsite. Intermediate cohorts are usually 12-35 people. Mastery cohorts are usually 8-24.
What should a two-day OpenAI Codex curriculum cover?
Cover the intermediate and mastery modules we already teach. Intermediate gives a mixed-experience team one shared OpenAI Codex workflow. Mastery takes experienced teams into multi-agent work, multi-repo models, and a champion model. We do not invent a fourth program for seniors.
What does Day 1 cover?
Day 1 installs Delegate, Review, Own, then context management with repo standards such as AGENTS.md. Seniors practice on large or legacy codebases and run debug mode with structured verification. The point is a shared operating model before anyone scales agent autonomy.
What does Day 2 cover?
Day 2 covers AI-assisted code review and test strategy, then org-level standards for adoption. Mastery cohorts add multi-agent orchestration, large-codebase and multi-repo models, review systems for high-autonomy flows, verification with CI and release discipline, reusable AGENTS.md, and the internal enablement champion model.
Who are the intermediate and mastery days for?
Both default to two days, onsite or offsite. Intermediate is usually 12-35 people and fits mixed-experience engineering teams. Mastery is usually 8-24 people and fits experienced teams that already use OpenAI Codex and need rollout rules that scale.
How this differs from generic vendor courses
EY, NobleProg, Coursera, DataCamp, OpenAI Academy, and official Codex workshops sell generic or official-vendor training. This workshop runs in the team repository with two trainers, so Day 1 and Day 2 use the team's own code and AGENTS.md.
Selected research
Representative field notes connected to this topic.
How to set up an AI coding workshop for your engineering team
How to set up an AI coding workshop: pick a format, scope it to your real repos and review habits, run hands-on labs, and leave with a shared playbook.
Codex mobile CLI docs your team can read anywhere
The codex mobile cli question is a docs question: how a team keeps AGENTS.md rules, run notes, and verification transcripts readable away from the desk.
Codex CLI 0.121.0 for repo workflows
Codex CLI 0.121.0 repo workflows: named connector owners, a pinned model in AGENTS.md, and PR receipts that survive reviewer handoffs.
Codex CLI 0.122.0: workflows, permissions, MCP
A Codex CLI 0.122.0 workflow guide: AGENTS.md instructions, permission boundaries, MCP rosters, and verification reviewers can replay.
Why agentic coding governance beats raw speed
Agentic coding governance beats speed: connector cards, child receipts, decision stubs, and scope ledgers that make agent diffs defensible after merge.
How to set up agentic coding workflows and guardrails
A field guide to agentic coding workflows and guardrails: handoff receipts, connector ownership, and review gates for engineering teams under deadline.
Related training topics
Bring this into your team
We tailor the training to your codebase, adoption stage, and review standards.
Book a 15-minute sync