Codex CLI vs Cursor vs Claude Code for teams
Together, our founders hold official ambassador roles for OpenAI, Anthropic, SpaceXAI (formerly Cursor), and n8n. We bring that experience into practical training on the tools your team uses. We apply these tools in real organizational settings ourselves. The same operating model runs across our sister workshop sites: technology strategy, software delivery, product execution, and business operations, translated into tool-specific training for teams.
We keep the brands separate because engineering teams do not adopt these tools in the same way. Use this guide to route the team to the dedicated workshop path that matches the tool they will actually use day to day: Cursor Workshop, Claude Workshop, or Codex Workshop.
Official ambassadors
3 specialist sites
Rogier Muller
Co-Founder
Vasilis Tsolis
Frequently Asked Questions
How to choose the right workshop path
Have you tried these?
Run the change on one branch. The methodology puts that in Review: an engineer still owns the merge. Training is the team version of that step.
Choose the right workshop path
Start with the tool your team will actually standardize on, then shape the Codex CLI training around your codebase, review flow, and adoption goals.
Where does your team stand?
Each team member completes the proficiency matrix individually. You receive a PDF with the team baseline and a recommended next step.
Assess your team